| Brand Name: | HongCe |
| MOQ: | 1 Set |
| Payment Terms: | T/T, L/C at sight |
| Supply Ability: | 10 Sets per Month |
A fogged headlamp is a warranty claim with a photograph attached, and the cause was decided months earlier at the bonding station. This two-chamber helium system proves the seal on every lamp housing at a production takt, at a charge pressure that will not distort a plastic part.
People assume a lamp is just a box with a lens glued on. It is a box with a lens glued on that also has to breathe. That contradiction is where most test specifications fall apart.
A lamp needs a pressure-equalisation membrane — an ePTFE vent — or it will fog from the inside as it heats and cools. The membrane is designed to pass air and water vapour and to keep liquid water out. Put that lamp in a helium test and it leaks by design, straight through the vent. A supplier who has not thought about this will quote you a machine that rejects 100% of good lamps, and the argument then becomes about the machine rather than the process.
The second difference is the material. Polycarbonate and PP move with temperature, absorb a little moisture, and outgas under vacuum. A test recipe written for a metal part will read a plastic lamp as unstable and drift the result. The third is pressure: charge a lamp at 1 MPa and the lens bows, the adhesive sees a load it never sees on the vehicle, and you may damage a lamp that would have passed.
Our cycle is built around those three facts rather than retrofitted to them: low controlled charge pressure, chamber-side vacuum, a stabilisation window long enough for the plastic, and a vent-port strategy agreed with you before the fixture is cut.
| Approach | How it works | When to choose it |
|---|---|---|
| Test before the vent is fitted | The housing is sealed with a plug in the vent seat, tested, then the membrane goes in | Vent pressed in at a later station — cleanest option |
| Seal the vent port during charging | Fixture caps the vent seat; helium goes in through a service port or the bulb opening | Vent already installed when the lamp reaches the test station |
| Reduce the acceptance limit to account for the vent | Not recommended | Only when the vent flow is known and stable — rarely the case |
| Item | Specification |
|---|---|
| Machine configuration | Two chambers, phase-shifted, soft-faced pneumatic fixtures |
| Chamber internal size | 700 × 500 × 400 mm each, sized to your lamp family |
| Minimum detectable leak | 1.0×10-8 mbar·L/s |
| Charge pressure range | 10 – 300 kPa, recipe controlled per lamp design |
| Cycle time | 40 s to 55 s per lamp, including stabilisation |
| Throughput | About 130 lamps per hour with one operator |
| Helium recovery | ≥90%, integrated loop |
| Vacuum system | Roots pump plus rotary vane pump per chamber |
| Control | PLC with 15-inch HMI, 100 recipes, multi-level access |
| Traceability | Barcode scan, per-lamp result log, MES upload over Ethernet |
| Calibration | Automatic sequence with calibrated leak, 12-month interval |
| Power supply | AC 380 V, 3-phase, 50/60 Hz, 12 kW |
| Compressed air | 0.6 MPa dry, oil-free |
| Weight | About 2000 kg |
| Test item | Typical defect | What the customer sees |
|---|---|---|
| Lens to housing adhesive bead | Gaps, cold joints, untreated bonding surface | Fogging after the first cold morning |
| Ultrasonic or hot-plate weld seam | Corner voids, incomplete melt, contamination | Water ingress after a wash |
| Vent port and membrane seat | Seal not seated, membrane punctured | Condensation that never clears |
| Connector grommet | Rolled seal, wrong insertion depth | Corrosion at the plug |
| Bulb or module socket seal | Unseated O-ring, flash under the seal | Moisture in the lamp, intermittent fault |
| Housing wall | Moulding porosity, weld line crack | Water tracks visible in the lens |
| Reworked lamps | Reseal that missed the original defect | Repeat claim on the same unit |
There is no universal conversion from IP67 or IP6K9K into a helium leak rate, because the answer depends on housing volume and on the pressure profile the standard applies. Anyone who offers you a table is guessing. What works is a short empirical exercise:
In practice, our lighting customers end up between 1×10-6 and 1×10-7 mbar·L/s. The exact figure matters less than the discipline of writing down the method alongside it.
| Method | Detectable band | Cycle | Effect on the lamp | Where it belongs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two-chamber helium, this machine | 1×10-8 mbar·L/s | 40–55 s | Dry, low pressure | 100% final inspection |
| Air pressure decay | About 1×10-3 mbar·L/s | 2–8 min | Dry | Gross leaks only; drifts with plastic temperature |
| Water immersion | Gross leaks only | Minutes | Water inside the lamp | Never — it destroys the part |
| Helium sniffer spray | 1×10-7 mbar·L/s | 2–5 min | Dry | Rework bench and field returns |
The comparison that matters is with air decay, because most lighting plants already own one. On a plastic lamp the air method fights the material: the housing absorbs heat, the internal volume is large, and the criterion is usually tighter than air can resolve inside a takt. Helium in a chamber sidesteps the fight instead of trying to win it.
Yes — the fixture seals the vent seat during charging, so the membrane is not part of the leak path being measured. We need the vent geometry with the enquiry, because that cap is part of the fixture.
Because the housing is plastic. Above roughly 300 kPa the lens starts to bow and the adhesive sees a load it never sees in service. Sensitivity comes from the chamber and the analyser, not from pressure. Testing a lamp at 1 MPa measures a condition that does not exist on the vehicle.
No — that is the plastic. Fresh parts release volatiles under vacuum, and the effect fades over a few hours. The recipe compensates for the background trend, but if your process feeds the test station straight from the moulding press, expect a slightly wider spread and set the limit accordingly.
Yes, if both fit the chamber. Fixture faces and recipe change with the part; the machine does not. Most customers run two or three families on one installation and select by barcode.
A chamber test tells you that it leaks, not where. A sniffer sweep along the bond line and around the grommet usually finds it in a couple of minutes — keep a portable detector at the rework bench rather than pulling lamps off the line for investigation.
We do not claim a conversion table. We run the correlation exercise on your parts: ten good lamps, plus a calibrated-leak lamp, and we document the spread and the chosen limit. If your customer audits the process, that document is what they will ask to see.
Dry it first, or the moisture will outgas and read as a leak. A short dry cycle at moderate temperature before testing is enough in most cases; we can add it as a recipe step if you plan to test returns routinely.
Around 80 working days for a two-chamber system with fixtures. We need the lamp drawings, the vent design, the internal volume and the sealing standard — with those four, the fixture design starts the same week.
Since 2003 we have designed and built leak detection and electrical test equipment in Guangzhou, with 50–100 employees and about half of our production exported. The same engineering team commissions vacuum chamber systems for automotive air conditioning, battery and relay customers, so the recommendation for a lamp housing comes from production experience with sealed plastic assemblies rather than from a generic catalogue.
Each system is assembled, pump-down tested against a calibrated leak and recorded under its serial number before shipment. When you compare a result three years later, the original acceptance data is still on file.